Why did “centrist evangelical” Jim Wallis try to hide donations from pro-abortion far Left atheist George Soros?

And why does pro-abortion far Left atheist George Soros want to contribute to “centrist evangelical” Jim “the Gospel is all about wealth redistribution” Wallis?

So many questions.

See Wallis-Soros ties surfacing (OneNewsNow.com).

People who say that Social Security has a “trust fund” are ill-informed– or they think you are

You often hear from politicians that we must protect the Social Security “trust fund,” but the truth is that there is no such thing.  They know that – or at  least they should know that.  So they are ignorant and/or trying to deceive you, both of which are bad.

The government does not have the capability to set aside funds in a bank account like we do.  When the Social Security funds come in they are spent on Social Security, or, as they have done for decades, on other spending projects they didn’t want to raise taxes to fund.  Decades of dishonesty and financial mismanagement by both parties are becoming more visible.

If some of these Social Security funds went to private investments that you could control then that would limit how much the politicians could abuse.  But they don’t want to lose control, so they play on your fears that something bad will happen.

Yes, the market could crash and you could lose your investments.  It is a risky world.  But think about this: Whether your private account crashed or not it isn’t like the government is saving our taxes today to pay out tomorrow.  Either way the payouts they will make 10 years from now will come from taxes paid 10 years from now.

Simply put, we can’t lose by having at least part of current contributions devoted to private accounts.  The politicians will lose because they’ll have to find a way to fund current spending, or not spend the money at all.

Don’t let fear-mongering by politicians fool you.  The system has been broken for a long time.  Democrats didn’t want you to be informed and Republicans didn’t try hard enough to inform you.  But it isn’t that complicated.

Roundup

Speak the Gospel — use deeds when necessary – Seems that St. Francis probably didn’t say “Preach the Gospel at all times and when necessary use words.”  I didn’t realize that when I wrote Taking St. Francis too literally, but the content there still applies.  Even if he had said it, a cursory review of his life would show that he said it as hyperbole.  He was all about using words to share the Gospel.  Hat tip: The Pugnacious Irishman

Does the Old Testament condone slavery? – Excellent post on a common objection to the Bible.  Very clear and concise.  Read it and save the link.

Absolutely not.

The Old Testament speaks of slavery often, and lays out rules on how slaves were to be treated. This has caused some to become confused…but a basic understanding of the context for ancient near-eastern slavery shows that the Old Testament does not condone slavery. Let’s look at some common assumptions . . .

Hat tip: Wes from Facebook

Author: More teens becoming ‘fake’ Christians – how about your church and your kids?

Hey WordPress users: I just started using the Zemanta feature.  When you write posts it prompts you with suggested tags, related links and public domain pictures.  This is a big time-saver!

To add Zemanta, go to Users > Personal Settings in your Dashboard. You’ll see a new option near the end of the page that lets you add Zemanta to your posts. Click “Help me find related content (images, links, related articles, and tags) to use in my posts.” Hit “Save Changes” at the bottom of the page. You can turn it off at any time.

Hypocritical Al Sharpton Doesn’t Know the First Thing About Martin Luther King’s Legacy

Al Sharpton is a professional bigot. During his long career the Reverend has incited two anti-Semitic pogroms; the Crown Heights riot and the firebombing of the Jewish-owned Freddy’a Fashion Mart in Harlem. Each of the Sharpton-incited pogroms resulted in deaths, but now for some unknown reason Reverend Al believes he is the caretaker of religious tolerance in the country, as well as the protector of Reverend Martin Luther King Jr’s legacy of peaceful protest.

Hat tip: The Other McCain

Evolutionary psychology: Evolutionary psychologists get stressed and start to cry over the evolution of crying

Darwinism requires that stupid, materialist explanations based on survival be preferred to obvious ones that start with the reality of the human mind and human cognition, so far as I can see.

Missouri law gets the science right

As noted in Media Deeply Concerned About Missouri Abortion Law, Not So Much About Sharia, Missouri gets the science right in a new law about informed consent for abortions.

The media tried to twist it into a debatable religious angle, even though the law just adds a simple, factual phrase to a pamphlet:

“The life of each human being begins at conception,” according to Senate Bill 793, which will add new regulations to the state’s 24-hour informed consent law for abortions. “Abortion will terminate the life of a separate, unique, living human being.”

Those words will be displayed “prominently” on brochures that abortion providers will be required to hand out to every woman seeking the procedure — even if they don’t happen to believe the Christian theology the words represent.

Of course all Christians should know that God created life and that we should protect innocent human beings from being aborted.

But this law isn’t based on religion, it is based on an irrefutable scientific fact: The unborn are unique, living human beings from conception.  Go check out those pesky embryology textbooks in the link.  Or just think about the logic for about 5 seconds: What other type of being would two human beings create?   Of course it is a human being.  Who cares if / when it has a soul?  If you think the timing of the soul is important then you need to prove exactly when it comes into being or explain why we wouldn’t err on the side of caution.

The article also highlights how ridiculous it is to protest the requirement to share scientific facts with women about to have their unborn children destroyed while turning a blind eye to the creeping Sharia law of Islam.  What does Sharia declare?

  • Women are inferior to men.
  • Women should have fewer rights and responsibilities than Larry the Cable Guy.
  • Women count for one-half of a dude in giving evidence in a court of law.
  • Women should be horse whipped if they ever make their husband feel like a dork.
  • Victoria’s Secret Miraculous Bra (with extreme level 5 cleavage) makes God angry.
  • Women can’t say squat in regard to whom they’ll marry, what they’ll wear, where they’ll live, or whether or not they can divorce their cheating and/or abusive husband.
  • Girls can be wed beginning at the ripe old age of frickin’ nine.
  • Women should be cool with hubby having a couple of hoochies or female slaves on the side.
  • Women, on the pretext of “honor,” should be locked up, isolated and unable to have a girls’ night out at Mango’s on Ocean Drive.
  • Say, where are all the feminists yelling about “my body, my life” when it comes to Islam?

False teacher Chuck Currie doubles down on his race-baiting

Wow, Chuck just can’t stop shooting himself in the foot!  After embarrassing himself by calling Pastor D.L. Foster a racist (turns out that Chuck didn’t know Foster is black) in Come, Let Us Reason Together: We Must Confront Racism With Directness & Reconciliation In Mind, false teacher Chuck “Jesus is not the only way” Currie couldn’t bring himself to apologize.

Instead, he doubled down and said this about Pastor Foster, who experienced deliverance from the sin of homosexuality 20 years ago:

Rev. Foster attacks gays and African-Americans . . .

Yeah, sure, Chuck.  I’d love to see you debate Pastor Foster and tell him what a racist he is and how he didn’t really convert from being gay.

More hypocrisy from Chuck:

That fact remains that Rev. Foster pedals hateful rhetoric whatever his personal motivation might be.

Hmmmm . . . so Chuck the race-baiter misuses Bible verses and lies to advance his agenda but Pastor Foster is the hater?  Indeed.

Warning: Be sure to save your comments if you post at Chuck’s site.  He has a history of deleting comments that prove his ignorance, only to then lie about what the comments really said.  He even said I left racist comments (and homophobic, sexist, “and more”), though he has yet to provide evidence.  Should we be surprised that a false teacher would do such a thing?

Can Chuck Currie and the NCC get even one Bible passage right?

As noted in False teacher Chuck Currie outdoes himself, false teacher Chuck “Jesus is not the only way” Currie got caught in his game of hypocritical race-baiting.  His premise was allegedly to call people to reason and discussion, but he tipped his hand when when accusing a pastor of being and anti-black racist.  It seems that Chuck couldn’t be bothered to check a pesky detail like the skin color of the person he sought to demonize (turns out the pastor was black).

As a bonus, Chuck parroted a wrong translation of a Bible passage by the National Council of Churches (NCC).  In fairness, fake Christians like Chuck and authentic Christians both take verses out of context at times.  We can all make mistakes and get a little sloppy.

But I’m trying to think of any that Chuck gets right.  He reads John 14:6 and preaches that Jesus is not the only way.  He uses the Matthew 25 “least of these” phrase in roughly every other post but doesn’t realize any of the following:

  1. That passage refers to Christian brothers, not just any poor people.
  2. Jesus wants you to help them with your own money as opposed to the Liberal tradition of taking the money of others by force to redistribute as you see fit and take credit for it.
  3. Chuck is wildly pro-abortion, which is irreconcilable with anyone caring about the “least of these.”

There are so many more.  His abuse of Isaiah 1:18 is just the latest.

The prophet Isaiah (1:18) declares God’s message to the people to “Come let us reason together”. This injunction might serve us well in the present moment.  Reason, (yakah), in this passage does not refer to a dispassionate meeting of the minds but, rather calls for convincing, persuading and presenting a case for a point of view. Vigorous, principled debate advances our thinking and clarifies the challenges before us. Respect for neighbor strengthens the fabric of our communities.

via Come, Let Us Reason Together: We Must Confront Racism With Directness & Reconciliation In Mind.

He pompously pretends to care about reason and problem-solving.  But let’s look at the context of this verse.  Even if you just look at all of verse 18 you’ll see that Chuck and the NCC have misapplied it.  Read the surrounding verses and their problem gets worse.

Isaiah 1:15–20 (ESV)

15 When you spread out your hands, I will hide my eyes from you; even though you make many prayers, I will not listen;your hands are full of blood.

16 Wash yourselves; make yourselves clean; remove the evil of your deeds from before my eyes; cease to do evil,

17 learn to do good; seek justice, correct oppression; bring justice to the fatherless, plead the widow’s cause.

18 “Come now, let us reason together, says the LORD: though your sins are like scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they are red like crimson, they shall become like wool.

19 If you are willing and obedient, you shall eat the good of the land;

20 but if you refuse and rebel, you shall be eaten by the sword; for the mouth of the LORD has spoken.”

The verse and passage don’t give some generic advice for people to reason together.  God is telling sinful people to come to their senses and repent and believe.  Oh, if only Chuck and the NCC would preach that message!  But then, they’d have to believe it first, right?  And that is the problem: They are false teachers.  They pretend to be experts by quoting the Hebrew word for reason, but they miss the context of the word within the passage and even the verse.

What did they do here?  They just searched for the word “reason” and grabbed whatever verse popped up.  It makes them sound all “churchy,” I suppose, but it has nothing to do with the text.

What is worse is that Chuck uses it hypocritically.  He doesn’t want to reason with the other side.  He wants to be perceived as wanting to reason while continually playing the race card.  He is the one driving division.  If he told the truth then race-baiters like him would be out of a job.

False teacher Chuck Currie outdoes himself

I’ll be writing more about this later, but if false teacher Chuck “Jesus is not the only way” Currie realizes his error and pulls his post I wanted to get this documented.

See Come, Let Us Reason Together: We Must Confront Racism With Directness & Reconciliation In Mind where Chuck’s eagerness to race-bait trips him up and exposes his rank hypocrisy.  He isn’t interested in reconciliation, he’s interested in polarizing people and personal attacks.  He isn’t “confronting racism,” he is perpetuating it.  That’s what race-baiters like Chuck do.

I’ll give away the ending here: The man Chuck is calling a racist below is D.L. Foster, a black pastor and a friend of mine I know well through blogging and Facebook.  Pastor Foster is a real man of God, unlike Chuck who is a proven serial liar and false teacher.

Yeah, Chuck, Pastor Foster is racist against black people.  Be sure to go tell his congregation.  I imagine they’ll be mighty surprised!

Here’s another example:  this time from an anti-gay blog that can now be fairly labeled as racist as well.

From the Gay Christian Movement Watch:

On Wednesday, an unusual gaggle of  “leaders across the ideological spectrum”  released an open letter type statement rebuking anyone who questions the so-called “faith” of the Saviour of the United States (SOTUS). The Democratic party aligned media agency hired by the “70 prominent religious leaders” contends that anyone who questions whether Barack Obama is a real Christian is misrepresenting his faith.  The letter wanted to make the point that [the president’s] faith isn’t a political matter. I beg to differ.

What’s even more outrageous is the demand to prohibit the free speech rights of any American who may question Obama’s religious teleprompter faith.

“…we urge public officials, faith leaders, and the media to offer no further support or airtime to those who misrepresent and call into question the President’s Christian faith.”

Among the signatories: Bishop TD Jakes, Brian McLauren, Kirbyjon Caldwell and Rev. Chuck Currie…

Jakes (Oneness Pentecostal), McLaren and Currie are all false teachers.

People have a legitimate right to question any president’s public declarations of  the religious nature. Why is Obama exempt? Over and over he’s preached to the nation, lectured us on what the bible says ( from his progay-black liberation theology point of view), and couched his unpopular policies behind cherry picked scriptures.  He has, without question, done much more for the religion of death and violence (Islam) while sabotaging and deriding his own so called faith. And so, we are not supposed to question whether its right or wrong? We’re just supposed to shuffle our feet, give a big watermelon grin and pray for his continued success?

A “big watermelon grin…”  That’s not even veiled racism. It’s an obvious attempt to invoke a racist caricature of African-Americans.

Actually, if Chuck took the time to research just a bit, he’d realize that Pastor Foster was mocking people like Chuck and the President who take the black vote for granted and expect them to be happy with whatever crumbs they are thrown.

In addition, Pastor Foster isn’t “anti-gay.”  He is a former gay man who loves gays in the biblical sense (agape), meaning he cares enough to tell them the truth about what God’s word says about that behavior.  Chuck is the hater who blasphemed God by saying that the Holy Spirit told him that God is now in favor of “same-sex marriage” and that homosexual behavior isn’t a sin.

Be sure to visit Pastor Foster’s blog often.  He is a true man of God.

Here are Chuck’s closing comments.  Meditate on the hypocrisy:

Obviously, we must speak out against racism and against those who would seek to use race or religion to divide the American people.  Such means to achieve political ends cannot be tolerated.

The test that we face in the face of such hatred and racism is how we respond.  Christians must always we concerned not just with justice but also for the need for reconciliation because justice is just a far off dream if we remain divided.

Sure, Chuck.  If you really care about that then go look in the mirror.  And let’s not forget that you are pro-abortion, which has a rate in the black community three times that of whites, and how you support taxpayer-funded abortions which would make the rate even higher.  That’s black genocide and real racism.

Chuck also mis-characterized other comments he attributed to racism, and he further demonstrated that he knows little about Islam.  More on that later!

Good response from Pastor Foster here.

Warning: Be sure to save your comments if you post at Chuck’s site.  He has a history of deleting comments that prove his ignorance, only to then lie about what the comments really said.  Should we be surprised that a false teacher would do such a thing?