The Left tries to blame the NRA every time there is a shooting, even though none of the NRA members ever do the shootings in question. They make a big deal out of how the NRA has donated to politicians.
But check out the top lobbyists for 2017. The NRA is not one of the top 20 lobbyists, but even if they were, shut up, because 2nd Amendment.
And look who is on the list! Comcast, the customer service giant (ahem) and supporter of Leftist favorite “Net Neutrality.” So you know that would be good for consumers.
There are also lots of medical companies who want the government to give them more business. And the Chamber of Commerce, which loves illegal aliens as much as the Left.
And worst of all, the gun-grabbing Leftists ignore how Planned Parenthood, government-sector unions and other Leftist organizations partner with the politicians to take turns giving each other our money.
Please remind Leftists of these things when they bring up the NRA.
The tax bill in particular and Trump’s other economic initiatives in general (such as reducing regulations) are dramatically improving the financial situation of the entire country. Nearly everyone benefits from one or more of these:
Tax cuts that help at least 80% of the population and make it much easier to file for most people. And the few that do have to pay more are mainly the rich in Leftist states (as if you could do anything to please them anyway — and don’t they claim to like paying higher taxes?).
The stock market gains have been phenomenal. Anyone with any sort of retirement account has to be enjoying this. And it is all because of the Republican financial moves. The stock market always looks forward, so this is all about these changes and has nothing to do with Obama.
Many companies have raised wages and/or given bonuses, including Wal-Mart. This helps nearly everyone, because other companies will need to raise wages to keep up. That supply and demand thing has its sharp edges, but in this case it will help. And while wage increases can ultimately be inflationary, in this case the companies are using their tax savings to fund them so they won’t necessarily be raising prices. Haven’t Leftists always lamented Wal-Mart? Shouldn’t they be cheering now?
This is all so spectacularly good for everyone — except the radical Leftists who hate Trump so much that they’d deny these amazing benefits to the people they claim to care about.
The Left will go on hating Trump and get even more unhinged, but how do you think all those people getting tax cuts, pay raises and fatter retirement accounts will feel? Hopefully they’ll realize that Republicans have always been the adults in the room on economics. and that the Left has not only been lying to them but that they never really cared about them to begin with. The Republicans can campaign on having kept some major promises.
Yeah, because the U.S. protecting our southern border is virtually indistinguishable from the Berlin wall. Millions of people were illegally breaking into the Communist paradise of East Germany to get a vastly improved standard of living. They made all sorts of demands and were not getting deported even when they committed multiple felonies. And so much more. They are so ignorant that they don’t realize the Berlin wall was to keep people in the Communist hellhole. The Communists worked 24×7 to keep people from knowing how much better the West was.
In case you think that quote couldn’t be any more stupid, it was written by someone who spent decades teaching in public schools. And what did he teach? History.
The Left — including the “Christian” Left — advocates for physician-assisted suicide, so they are no different than Michelle Carter.
The texting-suicide trial of Michelle Carter attracted nationwide attention for many reasons.
There were the shocking text messages Carter, then a 17-year-old King Philip Regional High School senior, sent to 18-year-old Conrad Roy III of Mattapoisett, urging him to kill himself and chastising him when he appeared to have second thoughts.
It also attracted the attention of legal observers and civil libertarians, who criticized the case on freedom of speech grounds. They argued a person should not be held responsible for the death of another person for mere words in a state that has no law against urging someone to take his own life.
Carter, was a lonely high school senior with an eating disorder brought together with Roy, a troubled Mattapoisett man searching for his way in the world while fighting depression.
No, wait, they are worse, because they aren’t just a lone creepy girlfriend, they are institutionalized, mainstream advocates for you to kill yourself if you want to. And the “Christian” Left is the worst of all because they do it in the name of God.
Oh, they wring their hands when someone famous kills himself, like Robin Williams, but that just exposes their selfishness (i.e., “If you entertain me well, please don’t kill yourself, otherwise it is OK.”).
I have a dear brother in Christ who lives with severe pain. I’ve lost count of the number of spinal taps he’s had over the years, and that is just a small part of what he experiences. Yet he is totally committed to the Lord and makes a great witness for him wherever he goes — even preaching the Gospel to the hospital “chaplains” (usually glorified Unitarian / “Christian” Left types) he encounters. I rejoice that he is immune to the pro-assisted suicide ghouls of the “Christian” Left who actually applaud people who take their own lives.
Whether people thought Carter committed a crime or not, nearly all were repulsed at her behavior. They should feel the same way about those advocating for physician-assisted suicide (which eventually leads to involuntary killing, but that’s another issue).
The title is such a Captain Obvious kind of economic statement, founded on the simple and timeless impact of the law of supply and demand, that it should go without saying. But because Leftists literally fail at basic economic concepts and throw low economic status minorities under the bus to pander to illegal aliens, it needs to be repeated over and over.
The Left pretends that the only jobs that illegal aliens take are those of picking crops and such (as if that would justify them breaking the law). But here’s a recent example that I heard about in detail from an accounting executive of a company in the U.S. (I’m not being overly specific here because of confidentiality issues).
A couple hundred illegal aliens who performed semi-skilled labor walked off the job at a U.S. manufacturing company because they heard that Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was going to do a raid. (It wasn’t clear whether the company knew they were illegal aliens or not.)
The company was understandably desperate to fulfill their customer orders, so they went to the market to replace the employees. When they did so they realized that they had to pay fifty percent more in wages. Fifty percent!
The remaining employees who were citizens got a huge raise.
The new employees got market wages.
These jobs were ideal for those without college educations or formal training. They require some skill, but it can be learned on the job.
Simple and valuable lessons:
Illegal aliens took jobs of U.S. citizens, because they were willing to work for so much less.
Illegal aliens significantly suppressed the wages of the remaining jobs, because they were willing to work for so much less.
Law enforcement works! What a concept, eh? We still need a wall and/or much better border control, like any sane country would have. But in the mean time merely enforcing some of our existing laws has a huge benefit for our citizens. If companies know they’ll get caught and fined they won’t hire illegal alien labor to begin with. And the honest companies won’t be at a competitive disadvantage for doing the right thing.
Getting citizens off unemployment / welfare reduces the burden on society and has more people paying into the system.
The Left — including the “Christian” Left — pretends to care about low income blacks while acting against their best interests 24×7. They pander to illegals to get votes so they can stay in power and reap the benefits of crony capitalism, but that means the low income minorities stay on the Democrats’ plantation.
Obama & Co. pretended to care about blacks, but what did they have to show for it after 8 years besides higher unemployment, destroyed towns like Ferguson and the worst race relations in half a century? The Left has to constantly play the race card on Trump because he is actually helping them get jobs.
This doesn’t even include the huge tax burden of millions of illegal aliens consuming educational, welfare and other resources.
When the “Christian” Left tries to claim that Jesus was an illegal alien, remind them that their claim is historically false, we don’t live in an Israelite theocracy, and people who repeat that nonsense to promote open borders just for the U.S. are some combination of ignorance, malice and treason.
The working poor – which have a disproportionate amount of minorities – are already benefiting by the reduction of illegal aliens entering the country.
And, ironically, they have President Trump to thank for it.
Many Christians teach Leopard Theology*, because they believe that the Bible is only inspired in spots and that they are inspired to spot the spots. They don’t call it that, but that is exactly what their theology is founded upon. And, like the leopard, they camouflage themselves and they are dangerous predators. They take on church leadership roles even though they teach the opposite of the Bible.
Saying the Bible isn’t fully inspired by God may seem like a humble premise, but it actually makes several strong and unfounded claims.
It implies that God couldn’t or wouldn’t deliver His word to us in a reliable way, and that despite God’s alleged failings flawed humans are able to discern which parts were inspired and which parts were not. Are we to believe that humans are to correct for God’s errors?
Why is this a serious problem? It is hard enough to follow the teachings of the Bible without having “Christians” choose what “really” came from God. Worse yet, they ignore some parts of scripture so they can teach that the opposite is not only acceptable but desirable. Some may do it accidentally or out of laziness but others are just blatant false teachers. They have made up their own god and their own religion.
If someone claims the Bible is only partly inspired, ask a few questions:
How did they come to this conclusion?
Do they think their favorite verses are inspired? If so, how do they know? How about John 3:16? How about “love your neighbor?” Whenever “Judge not, lest ye be judged” is quoted, I never hear the liberal theologians question whether Jesus really said that.
If the Bible is only partly inspired, how can they be sure that their preferred verses aren’t the ones that are uninspired and the ones they don’t like are the “real” verses?
Why is it that God couldn’t inspire the original writings of forty writers, but He can inspire billions of people to properly determine which parts are right and which aren’t?
If He couldn’t get Paul, Luke, Matthew, John, etc. to record his word accurately, how can He get you to do it?
Why should I trust your “inspiration” over those who penned the Bible, or over my “inspiration?”
Then there is Advanced Leopard Theology. It is just like basic Leopard Theology, except God is also changing spots and adding or removing spots, and, oddly enough, He is only telling theological liberals and progressives. They use phrases such as “God is still speaking,” but they don’t mean He still speaks through his Word (that would be a true statement). They think He is still revealing new truths to the church and changing doctrines taught in the Bible. They may also say things like, “The Holy Spirit is moving in a new direction.” Indeed.
Here’s an example: A Methodist pastor named Laurie Hays Coffman did a pro-gay theology piece that made the argument that she wants to “unfurl our corporate sails to catch today’s winds as the Spirit blows afresh.” She said she was challenged by the vision God gave to Peter in Acts 10-11 where God makes it clear that the Gospel is for the Gentiles, too, and that the Israelites’ ceremonial dietary laws are no longer in force. Her reasoning is that in the same way that God overturned those laws that He is now overturning the prohibitions against homosexual behavior. If that looks like a non sequitur to you then you are correct. The problem is her poor Biblical analysis. There are at least nine things wrong with this view:
The person with the revelation was Peter, one of Jesus’ inner circle and a key leader in the early church. It wasn’t made to you, me or someone like Ms. Coffman. That doesn’t mean God couldn’t reveal something important like this to us, just that it is highly unlikely.
The visions were clear and emphatic. Peter was given the vision three times and the incident is mentioned twice.
Peter was inclined to reject the meaning of the vision, whereas these Advanced Leopard Theologians have views on human sexuality that are virtually indistinguishable from the prevailing culture and they are glad to accept this allegedly new revelation.
There was external validation for Peter from the Roman centurion, which also included a supernatural intervention.
This lesson showed up in the Bible, not outside it. I’m not saying miracles don’t happen outside the Bible. It is just that things appear in the Bible for a reason. God communicating that the ceremonial laws had been fulfilled was one of those “big deals.”
This vision overturned a ceremonial law, not a moral law. There are zero examples in the Bible of God reversing his moral laws. In fact, the more Jesus talked the stricter the laws seemed to get, because He emphasized the spirit of the law and not just the letter (i.e., lust was akin to committing adultery, anger was akin to murder, etc.). The dietary laws never applied to Gentiles.
The “God has changed his mind view” is primarily being “revealed” to theologically liberal Christians in the U.S. . . . the very ones who often deny the authority of his Word to begin with! So we can’t trust the accurate transmission of the original writings but we can trust their new revelations? I’m skeptical.
If God is revealing a change, why is it necessarily more liberal? Why couldn’t God make his laws more stringent?
The Bible gives strong warnings not to add or take away from its teachings.
But the orthodox can fall prey to this in a more subtle way by claiming full inspiration but conveniently ignoring passages we don’t like. Consider this passage on church leadership, where some exaggerate “not given to drunkenness” to mean no alcohol whatsoever but ignore the “must manage his own family well . . .” part.
1 Timothy 3:2-4 Now the overseer must be above reproach, the husband of but one wife, temperate, self-controlled, respectable, hospitable, able to teach, not given to drunkenness, not violent but gentle, not quarrelsome, not a lover of money. He must manage his own family well and see that his children obey him with proper respect.
Another example is correctly teaching about the sin of homosexual behavior while neglecting to give proper emphasis to Biblical admonitions against divorce, adultery and fornication. We need to teach all of scripture with balance. Grandstanding on sins that aren’t temptations to us and soft-pedaling those that are are not attractive or Christian things to do.
There are plenty of reasons and resources to defend the accuracy and integrity of all of the original scriptures. We don’t need to get sloppy and just follow the parts we like. And we truly miss out when we cast doubts on every passage and question if it is really the word of God.
I’ll close with some friendly advice: Don’t mess with God’s Word.
Deuteronomy 4:2 You shall not add to the word that I command you, nor take from it, that you may keep the commandments of the Lord your God that I command you.
Proverbs 30:5–6 Every word of God proves true; he is a shield to those who take refuge in him. Do not add to his words, lest he rebuke you and you be found a liar.
Revelation 22:18–19 I warn everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God will add to him the plagues described in this book, and if anyone takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book.
The Left hates Trump with the heat of 1,000 suns and the media’s 90+% negative — and often false — reporting will continue to take a toll on Republicans. But the tax cuts and tax simplification will help. Things like this will sway a lot of middle ground people right away: Taxpayers Could See Benefits From GOP Tax Bill as Early as February.
And while they won’t admit it, the Leftists will secretly enjoy having their taxes cut even as they scream, “Oh, the humanity,” over the government letting 80% of the population keep more of what they’ve earned. Oh, they won’t vote for Trump, but they will soften.
Back in the late 80’s or early 90’s I recall reading Kareem Abdul-Jabbar’s comments on Ronald Reagan. He basically said that while he disagreed with him on many things, he sure appreciated the tax cuts. I think you’ll see a lot of that in 2018.
Hopefully the people who continue to gain employment will realize it wasn’t because of the Democrats. The fact that zero Democrats voted for the bill will make a great soundbite for the GOP.
And you’d like to think that those liberated from the Obamacare mandate will be influenced by that change. The Republicans didn’t “repeal and replace,” but they got rid of one of the most odious parts of Obamacare. They can run on that and out the RINOs who only voted against Obamacare when they knew Obama would veto it.
Of course, the institutional Left — including the “Christian” Left — will continue to cry Russia/racism/harassment against the President while they hypocritically are the drivers of all three.
We look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen. For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal.